| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Discussion - Rorqual - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Amarisen Greams wrote: Let's say after the capital ship change the Rorqual has these defense stats added 25% resist to ewar +10 warp core strength. The industrial cores focus would become more combat/defensive vs its current form. Durning th...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.11.10 02:10:25
|
2. Sticky:[AEGIS] The Hecate - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Destoya wrote: Airi Cho wrote: Jayne Fillon wrote: this looks like it'll be the highest dps destroyer in the game if I'm not wrong even more than the 800 dps eris from Suitonia? 859 DPS with 3x T2 MFS (no gun rig), 810 with 2x MFS...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.22 05:34:46
|
3. T3's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: Market Wizard wrote: Joe Risalo wrote: I'm just gonna leave this here... I think increasing the training time by a ridiculous amount is a bad idea. It doesn't reduce the power of T3's but instead means that only the e...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.19 22:02:03
|
4. T3's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Joe Risalo wrote: I'm just gonna leave this here... I think increasing the training time by a ridiculous amount is a bad idea. It doesn't reduce the power of T3's but instead means that only the elite can fly a pwn boat. Increasing their...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.19 21:38:16
|
5. Sticky:[Aegis] Missile balance package - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
With all the suggestions about adding missile disruption into the TD mods which seems like a great idea, why not just shove the new missile bonuses into the existing computers and enhancers and call them weapons computers and weapons enhancers. B...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.19 20:34:20
|
6. T3's - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Leto Aramaus wrote: My wish is that "Tech 3" in EVE just means "choice", or "customizable". Not "better than T2", or "extremely advanced", or "extremely good". I'll +1 to that. The addition of the new T3 dessy's are making anything under the...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.19 19:57:29
|
7. An Idea on Marauders - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iain Cariaba wrote: Sure, there's some structure bashing going on there, and why the hell not? Marauders make great ships for bashing structures with their high dps in bastion, and not a whole lot of need to move for a while. I think you nee...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.13 22:17:57
|
8. Increase mission rewards and standings for fleets - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hopelesshobo wrote: Market Wizard wrote: Incursions are another topic all together which should be moved to low and null only solely because of the amount of isk that can be made per day rivals the amount a FW alt sitting in an empty system...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.13 06:07:32
|
9. Increase mission rewards and standings for fleets - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aza Ebanu wrote: James Baboli wrote: I am mostly trying to point out that any content which scales linerarly or better will be multi-boxed all to hell. Thats okay. Incursions, Cosmic anomalies already are. What you are saying isn't news. ...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.13 04:05:00
|
10. New Ship Type in Eve - The Warbarge - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP has said "No" to the idea of a ship that can have multiple capsuleers in it so many times that the very thought of someone wanting to report the thread will get ISD's attn and in here to lock it.
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.12 06:34:29
|
11. Cyno capture device - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I see one problem and one exploit from this. First, the problem that will come is when a player lights a cyno, and the group send in pilots from systems x, y, z, and q. Which path does this thing track. The exploit. two JF pilots need to do some...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.06.07 20:04:33
|
12. Filling The Gap - T2 Battleships: The Carrier Escort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Justin Cody wrote: Won't have ridiculous EHP out of bastion. It can be capped out by neuts just as easily as any other sub cap BS can. Im going to just snip this portion out and give a quick look into what I would start with IF these were ev...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.05.31 21:40:53
|
13. Filling The Gap - T2 Battleships: The Carrier Escort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Balancing should always be done around PVP btw, never high sec PVE activities. And a tier of ships with a price tag around 1 billion a pop is not likely to ever make it on a high sec ganker's top 10 list of ships to use. B...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.05.31 20:43:32
|
14. Filling The Gap - T2 Battleships: The Carrier Escort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: Once we fill the power gap between sub caps and capitals we can then look to properly balancing capital hulls. In my opinion starting by vastly increasing build requirements of carriers more on the lines of a dreadnought. The...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.05.31 19:21:54
|
15. Filling The Gap - T2 Battleships: The Carrier Escort - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aside from the reasons from everyone else for why these ships should not be put in the game, can you explain a few things that you have not explained yet. Why do T2 hulls not have a second set of bonuses? Is it that you realize they would be over...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.05.31 18:43:47
|
16. Re-balance Evasive Maneuvers Ganglink and Halo Implants. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I would suggest also giving those values with the other sources of sig reduction. CCP has to consider low use, mid use, high use, and obscene use of all things that affect the same stat for balancing purposes to make sure nothing becomes the "End ...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.05.15 19:38:49
|
17. Eris needs help - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm going to assume you think you are the center of the universe and you can't see past your nose. The Interdictors are NOT exclusive Null/WH ships, they can be used in high/low. In low sec the Eris has been a monster with rails and Thorium with...
- by Market Wizard - at 2015.01.24 10:25:45
|
18. WTS Focused JF Pilots - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Isk and account name sent to Tutasha
- by Market Wizard - at 2014.11.07 19:23:29
|
19. WTS Focused JF Pilots - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
I am buying Tutasha for 8b
- by Market Wizard - at 2014.11.07 09:50:37
|
20. WTS Little Beginners Minier 5,071,557 SP - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
2.7b
- by Market Wizard - at 2014.08.06 07:14:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |